Kronus Communications
← Insights

How to Search Your Company the Way a Reporter Does

A ten-minute reputation audit: the private-window searches, the four added words and the screenshots that show what page one says about you before a reporter does.

Oct 14, 2026 · By Adrienne Uthe

Most leaders have searched their own company name. Almost none have searched it the way a reporter, an investor or a plaintiff's lawyer would. The difference matters. Your usual search is shaped by your history, your location and the pages you visit. A stranger's search is not.

This is a ten-minute audit. It costs nothing and it tells you what page one says about you to anyone with a reason to look.

What Is the Right Way to Search Your Own Company?

Search in a private or incognito window, signed out of every account. That removes most personalization, so you see something closer to what an outsider sees. If you can, ask someone in a different city to run the same searches, because local results vary.

Do not stop at the company name. A reporter researching a story does not type "Acme Corp" and read the first result. They add a word that points at trouble.

The Four Words to Add

Run your company name, then run it again with each of these:

  1. lawsuit. Court filings, settlements and law firm blog posts surface here.
  2. complaint. Regulator pages, review sites and consumer forums.
  3. scam. Often the harshest results, and sometimes unfair, but they rank anyway.
  4. former employee. Workplace review sites and forum threads.

Then repeat the exercise for your CEO and two or three other named executives. People searches are where old press, old posts and mistaken identities tend to show up.

Whatever sits on page one for these searches is your reputation to anyone who has a reason to look. That is true even if it is outdated, partial or wrong.

What to Record

Do not rely on memory. For each search:

  • Take a dated screenshot of page one.
  • Note the top three results and who owns each one: you, a news outlet, a review platform, a third party.
  • Flag anything that is factually wrong, anything that is out of date, and anything that is accurate but unflattering.

Keep the three categories separate. Wrong information may be correctable. Out-of-date information may be answered with newer, better material. Accurate but unflattering information is not something to fight; it is something to prepare for.

How to Read What You Find

If page one is clean, you now have a baseline. Save the screenshots. When a story breaks, you will know exactly what changed and when, which makes every later decision faster.

If page one has a problem, you know it before a reporter does. That is the whole benefit. You can decide what to say, who needs to hear it from you and whether anything is worth correcting.

If your own pages are missing, that is the quiet finding. When owned pages such as your about page, leadership bios and a plain statement of facts do not rank, third parties fill the space. We cover what to publish in After Bad News Breaks, Page One Is Decided in the First Week.

What to Do With the Results

Three actions cover most cases.

Correct what is wrong. Contact the publisher or platform with the specific error and evidence. Be calm and factual. For when removal is realistic and when it is not, see how to remove negative search results.

Build what is missing. Make sure there are accurate, current pages you control: a clear company description, leader bios, and a place where you can post dated statements. Cross-link them. Update them when facts change.

Brief your team. The person who answers the phone when a reporter calls should have seen these screenshots already. Add them to your crisis binder next to your approval chain and holding statements.

What This Audit Does Not Do

A manual search shows what ranks today. It does not monitor what changes tomorrow, and it does not show what is being said in channels search engines do not index well, such as social posts, messaging groups or newsletters. If your exposure is high, you will want ongoing monitoring and a response plan, not a one-off check. Our guide to reputation monitoring services explains what to look for.

It also does not replace judgment about who is looking. A prospective investor, a journalist and a former employee's lawyer each search differently. Run the audit once as each of them.

How Often to Repeat It

Run it quarterly, and again before any event that invites scrutiny: a funding round, a leadership change, a lawsuit, a product recall, an acquisition. Compare against the last set of screenshots. Changes in order matter as much as new results.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do reporters find when they search a company?

Usually the first page of results for the company name, then for the name plus a word such as lawsuit, complaint or former employee. They look for court filings, regulator pages, review sites and previous coverage. Page one for those searches is effectively your public record.

Should I search while logged in?

No. Use a private window, signed out. Logged-in searches are personalized by your history and location, so they can hide what an outsider sees.

Can I remove unflattering results?

Sometimes. Inaccurate or illegal content may be removable by the publisher or under platform policy. Accurate, lawfully published content usually is not. In that case the practical answer is to publish better, more current material and prepare your response.

How often should I run this audit?

Quarterly, and before any event that raises scrutiny, such as a financing, a leadership change or litigation.

Want a Reporter's-Eye Reputation Audit?

We run this review for organizations and turn it into a response plan. Talk to Kronus about a reputation and crisis readiness review, or see how we compare in our guide to the best crisis communications firms.

Related insights

Tell us what you're working on.

A senior member of our team replies within 24 hours. In an active crisis, call (715) 418-1614.

All inquiries are strictly confidential.